Friday, March 28, 2008

EARTH HOUR 2008 /29 MARCH 08/ 8-9 PM

EARTH HOUR 2008 /29 MARCH 08/ 8-9 PM

By turning off your lights for one hour on 29 March, from 8 to 9 pm, YOU participate in the fight against global warming.

On 29 March 2008, De La Salle Philippines will support Earth Hour, a global climate change initiative run by Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF), the conservation organization, which calls on individuals and businesses around the world to turn off their lights for one hour. Last year, more than 2 million Sydney residents joined Earth Hour by flicking the switch, turning appliances off stand-by-mode and enjoying an hour of quiet darkness. The aim of the campaign is to express that individual action on a mass scale can help change our planet for the better.ONE LA SALLE for
one hour.




Tuesday, March 25, 2008

"Fashion to Passion"

If you’re in need of a fresh dose of the latest in fashion or you’re already moonlighting as the next style icon, “Fashion to Passion” will give you your headstart in the fashion industry. Meet and connect with the country’s top designers and stylists on April 4-5, 2008 at De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde’s School of Design and Arts for the lowdown on the newest trends and the best tips in the industry.

Topics include:

  • Work it! Work it! Styling and Fashion Photography
  • Read the label: The Business of Fashion
  • Maria Clara to Marie Claire: Updating the Filipiniana
  • Style 101: A Crash Course on Style and Smart Clothing
  • See to Believe: Visual Merchandising
  • It’s in the Details: Fashion Accessories

Speakers include:

  • Brian Bravo
  • Helena Carratala
  • Joey Espino
  • Duzzi Gutierrez
  • Rajo Laurel
  • Mike Mariano
  • Dita Sandico Ong
  • Wynn Wynn Ong
  • Brian Tenorio
  • Xeng Zulueta
  • … and more!

For fees, updates and more details, please log on to http://fashiontopassion.multiply.com or contact Ms. Perpi Tiongson at 536-6752 loc. 121.



Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Search for Ms. Earth Lasallian 2008: "A Night of Beauty and Nature"


By Moler James Memoria

The Search for Ms. Earth Lasallian 2008 was held on February 13, 2008 at the Arts Center at 7:00 in the evening

It was the night of collision between beauty and wit which was participated by 14 gorgeous and witty ladies from the LSU- Integrated school and LSU Night High School. The participants outwit, outplayed, and out charmed each other in order to gain the coveted title of the night – in the Ms. Earth Lasallian 2008.

But among the 14 ladies, Ms. Ryza Mae Reyes, of the Night High School, took home the crown as the Ms. Earth Lasallian 2008. Her uncanny talent in impressing the crowd and judges whether her speech or her poise, became the ticket for her to win the prestigious crown.

The runners-up composed of four lovely ladies from the De La Salle teams took the three other titles represented by their elements. Ms. Rovelyn Bale of the Red team took hold of the titles Ms. Fire; Ms. Angela Talibong of the Dark Blue Team grabbed the title Ms. Air, and Ms. Christine Grace Villa of the Dark Green Team won the title, Ms. Water.

Ms. Christine Grace Villa of the Dark Green Team received two special awards of the evening; the Best Speaker award for her impressive speech as a Lasallian in the awareness for the environment and the Best in Costume that portrayed the four elements: water, earth, air and fire.

Judges of the event were the respected faculty and staff of the university, Mr. Sotero Malayao Jr., the Assistan Vice President for Academics and Chairman of the Board of judges, Ms. Alma Ligaya Alegre of the Math and Sciences Department, Mr. Rio Salaguting of the P.E Department and Ms. Crystelin Yting of the Business of Economics and Mrs. Elsie Dajao, an instructor from the Languages Department and the former Languages Coordinator.

CED champs LSU's First Asian Parliamentary Debate Championship


By Dandie Somoson

CED representatives. Ms. Rychenn Acapulco, Ms. May Christine Aguilar and Ms. Chelou Mugot were crowned as the Champions of the 1st Asian Parliamentary Debate on February 15, 2008.

After series of elimination rounds, LSU’s First Asian Parliamentary Debate reached the championship round on February 15, 2008 at the LSU Forum. The bes and the strongest teams who vied for the title were COA represented by Ms. MM Blanco (prime minister), Mr. Garry Curayag (deputy prime minister), and Ms. Joy Marie Engcoy (government whip) and the CED with the following speakers - Ms. Rychenn Acapulco (leader of the opposition), Ms. May Christine Aguilar (deputy leader of the opposition ), and Ms. Chelou Mugot (oppositoion whip). The adjudicators of the said championship were Mrs. Cathy Maghamil, Mr. Ryan Arances, Mr. Jade Bamba, Ms. Omega Lapitan, and the chief adjucator Atty. Roel Camorro.

With the motion “Political rallies do more good than harm,” team COA (government side) firmly believed with their stand that such movements bring nothing but physical injuries, harassments, discouragement to the foreign investors and the like. Thus, they proposed to have a creative way in experiencing the clamors and lamentations of the people in which they suggested to have these rallies be held in Freedom Park with the due permission and booking,. However as expected, the team CED strongly opposed them with their points. They stressed that the benefits of these rallies to people and accentuated the better changes to happen wherein faulty administration would be minimized if not eradicated if the power of the people will be freely exercised.

The adjudicators rated the round as above average. Before the announcement of the winning team, special awards were given first to Ms. Chelou Mugot, as the best speaker for the whole event with the total score of 224 points, followed by Mr. Kurt Cajeta, with 222 points, and by Mr. Felmar Lopez, Ms. MM Blanco, and Anthony Abcede, with 220 points each. Ms. Chelou Mugot was also named as the Best Speaker for the championship round. Chief adjudicator, Atty. Roel Camorro awarded the championship to team CED.

Monday, March 17, 2008

Towards a Morally Rebuilt Nation

Today we are experiencing a social and political mess. This however goes beyond the question of truth to the search for probity. Probity is about the integrity of all, the accuser and the accused. We are unhappy and we feel betrayed. And yet as Pope Benedict XVI reminds us “in spite of our great disappointment our great hope can only be God who has loved us and who continues to love us to the end, until all is accomplished”, (Spe Salvi, 27). We also know that together we have the capacity to correct and purify the nation by starting with ourselves.

The Model for Change is the Desert.

The history of salvation teaches us that the long road to freedom inevitably passes through the desert of purification and conversion. Having escaped from Pharaoh, via the miraculous crossing through the Sea of Reeds, the Israelites considered themselves liberated. But they were not yet free, because they wanted to go back to their old ways in Egypt. “Should we not do better go back to Egypt?” (Numbers 14: 2- 3).

The chosen people hesitated at the shores of the Sea and remained enslaved. So Moses led Israel away from the Sea of Reeds, and they entered the desert of Shur. (Exodus 15: 22). Believing that Pharaoh was the idolater refusing them the worship of the true God, it was in the wilderness where the people discovered that they too were guilty worshipers of golden idols. (Exodus 32: 1-29). People were disciplined and converted from their greed (Exodus 16: 17-21); and the desert which the Israelites feared to enter became for them a place of purification, discipline and conversion, before they could enter the promised land of freedom, forty years later. There are yet no proven easy short cuts to conversion and renewal.

Looking back at EDSA I, euphoric and heroic as it was, it appeared that the event became the Filipinos’ day of crossing to freedom; but that was only the first step that hardly anyone knew. The “desert” awaited the people who would be purified and converted, before they become fully liberated. But people preferred the convenient streets as the easier route to an imagined freedom, and feared the “desert experience” that awaited conversion and new beginnings.

Corruption as the cancer of the nation.

We cannot add more to the wrath of God for lies, untruth, injustice and evil. Conscience, as the voice of God within, already tells us of what good there is to pursue and what evil to avoid. Our people are known to be God-fearing and God- loving; sadly, they fight, deceive and kill for money.

Shamefully we have been known to be a nation whose prime industry has been identified as politics simply because politics is the main route to power, which, in turn, is the main route to wealth (1). In this country people use politics to get money, and more politics to protect more money. “Corruption radically distorts the role of representative institutions, because they become an arena for political bartering between clients' requests and governmental services. In this way political hoices favor the narrow objectives of those who possess the means to influence these choices and are an obstacle to bringing the common good of all citizens.” (Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, 411).

The subordination of the public good to individual or group interests is what corruption is all about. In whatever form it takes, the practice of corruption is both immoral and unjust. Corruption is worse than lies, because lies are employed only to cover it. Whenever Government money is stolen or whenever suppliers or contractors’ money is offered as bribe to secure projects, to the disadvantage of the Government graft or corruption is committed. Graft is the acquisition of gain by dishonest, unfair and sordid means through the abuse of one's position in politics, business, etc., while corruption is the improper enrichment of politicians or civil servants or those close to them by the misuse of public power entrusted to them. [BIR, Revenue Memo Circular 12-2005]. As an injustice to the Government and people graft and corruption are against the Seventh Commandment and have the added element of betraying one's country.

The Universal and All-time Application of the Seventh Commandment.

The Seventh Commandment, “Thou shall not steal”, applies to all, as individuals or as groups. Thus, if one holds on to money or its equivalent that is not his or hers (or theirs), justice demands restitution of the stolen or bribe money to the owner. (CCC, 1459). If the owner can no longer be located, then the money should be given to the poor, or to a credible institution that will give the money for the poor or give true services for the poor.

Restitution was the constant teaching in relation to the violation of the Seventh Commandment in the Bible. “If anyone steals..., he will pay back”. (Exodus 21: 37).

“Look Lord, I am going to give half my property to the poor, and if I have cheated anybody I will pay him back four times the amount”. With this confession, the Lord Jesus blessed Zacchaeus with salvation. (Luke 19: 8-10). The teaching of the Church on stealing is this: No Restitution, no absolution. In the words of Jesus: with Restitution, there is Salvation. (Luke 19: 9). An authentic conversion demands willingness to restore what has been stolen and the resolve not to steal again. The penitent should not be so complacent about one's faith as to consider oneself truly absolved before God on account of faith alone, even if one has no contrition... For faith without penance would effect no remission of sins. (Council of Trent).

The mandate of the Seventh Commandment is also addressed to traders and ordinary citizens in all practices of business, commerce and trading. Fraud in business, over pricing, bribery
in contracts, cheating in scales, cheating in legitimate taxes and the smuggling of taxable goods, including also the smuggling and trafficking of substances for abuse to damn the innocent and the weak members of society, etc. --- all these are among the many forms of violating the Seventh
Commandment.

Our Response: Our desert experience.

The old and the young, from kindergarten through high school on to the tertiary level of education till up to the licensure exams, are all to be formed and guided towards integrity, trained never to cheat in studies and exams. The “discipline of the desert” is to be taught and applied, if anyone is to succeed at any level towards “the fullness of life”.

The Seventh Commandment covers not only the present corruption deals that have been recently exposed, but also all deals, at all levels of government service, of all administrations and governance, no matter what came out of the past or will come out of the present or future inquiries. “Thou shalt not steal” covers also all trading of even ordinary citizens.

We suddenly notice that the widespread corruption we see in others is also the corruption we detect in ourselves. Corrupt practices and fraud prevailed in the cities, towns and even in small Barangays. In the last two generations there had been tens of thousands of graft-ridden contracts in Government, the biggest single controversial project ever recorded in Philippine history was the Westinghouse’s Bataan Nuclear Plant (2).

True liberation will mean that we enter our desert of repentance and conversion. Change lies only at the heart of every person. Let us begin there. Values for living justly will be preached in parishes, prayed for in the homes, re-taught in schools, discussed in small communities and groups. Support structures will be required for a righteous life and fair dealings. After our personal and communal “desert” conversion, we will,
please God, be ushered to the freedom we seek.

God’s Help is always needed.

We need God’s grace, if we are to encourage one another, forgive each other, pay our debts to the justice that we all violated, and start again, not at the banks of “our Sea of Reeds”, but beyond the streets of EDSA. Believers and lovers of God, like true Christians, do not have to hate, destroy each other even if they want to correct the mistakes of the past or the present and of each other. Many are critical of the present governance particularly in the areas of truth and justice. But we can restore truth and justice without resorting to violence and hatred. A nation built on contempt is completely unimaginable. As pastors we cannot tell you less, even if some will resent the way we teach. It is for everybody's good, especially the very poor among our brothers and sisters that we now address this call for communal renewal.

We need the leaders from the highest to the lowest and their families not only to lead us, but also to give us examples of repentance and true humble conversion. We also need people with other ideas but with positive emotions in nation building. Given the example and encouragement, the citizens will be
inspired to follow where in the past they hesitated to proceed -
-- to their “desert” transformation.

Ngayon, diretso na tayo sa hindi natin kaagad gustong puntahan --- sa Disyerto ng ating mga masamang karanasan at kasalanan na dapat nating baguhin! May Pag-asa po ang ating Bayan at ang ating sarili. Basta’t sa pagbabago kay Kristo Hesus tayo ay magsama-sama.

In prayer let us beg Mary and Joseph to lead us back to the Christ that we had lost in the past! God bless us all!

+ Gaudencio B. Cardinal Rosales
Archbishop of Manila


Bp. Honesto Ongtioco
Bishop of Cubao

Bp. Jesse Mercado
Bishop of Paranaque

Bp. Deogracias Iniguez
Bishop of Caloocan

Bp. Francisco San Diego
Bishop of Pasig

Bp. Gabriel Reyes
Bishop of Antipolo

Bp. Antonio Tobias
Bishop of Novaliches

Bp. Jose Oliveros
Bishop of Malolos

Bp. Leo Drona
Bishop of San Pablo

Bp. Luis Antonio Tagle
Bishop of Imus

Bp. Pedro Arigo
Vicar Apo.of Puerto Princesa

Bp. Edgardo Juanich
Vicar Apo. of Taytay

Bp. Leopoldo Tumulak
Military Ordinariate

Bp. Francisco de Leon
Auxiliary Bishop of Antipolo

Bp. Broderick Pabillo
Auxiliary Bishop of Manila

Bp. Bernardino Cortez
Auxiliary Bishop of Manila



Palm Sunday, 2008
(1) Samuel Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies,
p. 67.

(2) Ricardo Manapat, Some are Smarter than Others, ($1.9B
in 1981 to $2B in 1982), pp. 324328; 341.

On Joe de V, Jun Lozada, Blink, and the Hinge Factor

By Felicito C. Payumo

February 15, 2008
Article for the Management Association of the Philippines

I visited Joe de V in his residence on the morning after that fateful "night of a hundred knives". We were together for almost twelve years in the House, but I have not visited him since I got out of Subic and when he was still entrenched as Speaker. I thought it was better that I was seeing him when I didn't have any favor to ask, and he was absolutely powerless to grant any.

It was already 9 a.m. and no one else was in the sala. I was alone for one full hour before the media people started coming in to interview the ex-Speaker. Yes, there were some manangs who arrived later, but they were relatives from Pangasinan. There were no Congressmen, local officials or businessmen. Outside the house, the street was unusually empty of cars.

For those who knew him well, it was not hard to like Joe de V. Although prone to hyperbolic statements, he was amiable to a fault. He dislikes confrontation. To him there is no gap that cannot be bridged, and no quarrel that cannot be resolved or smoothed over…a quintessential diplomat or a shrewd politician. But there is no mean bone in his body. How come he was suddenly abandoned?

Not many days later, we would be watching Jun Lozada on TV during the Senate hearing. No one knew him personally, but everyone's heart went out for him. When he cried, I saw not a few tearful eyes in the crowd. Why the flood of sympathy for him?

That he was articulate helped, but beyond that, it was easy for people to identify themselves with him. It didn't matter that he owned up to his share of moral lapses and even outright transgressions.

His imperfections only made him more credible. In Lozada, they see a neighbor, a relative or a friend who was violated by the State… not just his physical body but his person (nilapastangan ang pagkatao), and not just by plain thugs but by the goons of the State. They, likewise, felt violated. They are smart enough not to swallow the line of the President's men that Lozada was being protected when he was held captive during that long "joyride".

Why did the people believe Lozada and not those arrayed against him? It's only his word against the others'. Malcolm Gladwell (The Tipping Point) explained it in his other book, Blink. In a blink, people can tell if one is telling the truth or weaving a tale.

Just like the students can tell if a professor will be a lousy one after his first lecture. They don't have to wait until the end of the semester to render their judgment. Gladwell calls it the power of thin slicing - "human beings are capable of making sense of situations based on the thinnest slice of experience."

Is that the reason why the people know whose voice it was in the "Hello Garci" tape? No obfuscations from the "I have two tapes" tale of Secretary Ignacio Bunye or the voice print analysis from Mike Defensor can change their mind. And they were proven right by the "I am sorry" statement. There are, of course, exceptions. But more often than not, you can trust your rapid cognition. More information does not necessarily mean better.

What would the end game be? The impatient ask if this is the tipping point. It is hard to tell. But if the Administration has to learn from history, it is that hinge factors can cause events to take a sudden turn; that chance and stupidity can change the course of history. A student of military history, Erich Durschmied, has shown that many conflicts have been decided by the caprice of weather, or plain individual folly or incompetence.

From Agincourt to Mactan and to Vietnam the hinge factor was weather or human stupidity or the deadly combination of both. The numerically superior and armored French chevaliers were mowed down by the lances and arrows of the foot soldiers and archers of Henry V because of the fatal disregard by the French Commander of a field of battle made heavy by rain. "The soggy ground gripped the horses' hooves like thick molasses."

History repeated itself. What folly moved Magellan to disregard the long distance from his boats to shore because of low tide? Weighed down by their steel armor as they trudged on sharp corals, they were mowed down by the kampilan and spears and arrows of the foot soldiers and archers of Lapu-Lapu.

In Vietnam, the hinge factor was a single incident- the chief of South Vietnam's police, firing point blank into the head of another Vietnamese in a checked shirt and black shorts. While daily televised reports into American homes had helped catalyze public opinion against American involvement in the war, it was this one photograph, "the death of a man in a checked shirt on a street corner in Saigon, that first confirmed to many across the U.S. that this was a war fought for the wrong reasons, in the wrong country and on the wrong side…
From that moment on, American Generals had to fight world opinion instead of the Vietcong, and American soldiers had to sacrifice their lives for no gains whatsoever."

That stupid act done in front of the camera could only be matched by another stupid act of shooting into the head of a man in the tarmac of our airport. That was what started the chain of events that unhinged the grip on power by the Marcos dictatorship.

Would the stupid act of seizing Lozada out of the airport and through the same tarmac, the unleashing of the Government's wrath against this probinsyanong intsik for speaking out, the repression of the rights of citizens and the paranoid reaction to the statements of the businessmen start the snowballing of anti-Administration demonstrations?

The answer is: It depends on how stupid the Government would respond. Like the text message threat to Ramon del Rosario, Jr.? That was a warning shot to all Makati Business Club members and the Management Association of the Philippines. Will they be cowed or now join the masa by sending down not just confetti but their employees to every demonstration on Ayala Avenue?

But history has been as much marked by chance and stupidity as by gallantry and heroism. We have countless stories of heroic feats of individual soldiers that turned the tide of battles. But there was one patriotic act of a Filipino General that prevented bloodshed by letting history run its course…in favor of the people.

General Artemio Tadiar was in command of a marine brigade that was ordered to fire shells into Camp Aguinaldo when the crowd was still thin. Since I was at EDSA with a group of friends at that time, I was curious and asked him after he was subsequently assigned in Subic as Commander of the Subic Command (SubCom) why he did not obey.

He said that he did not directly defy the order. To buy time, he asked permission to drive to Malacanang to "clarify the order." After getting final instructions to carry out the order, he took a round-about route back to his command. By that time, the crowd has thickened and he told Malacanang that to comply with the order would cause the massacre of thousands of civilians. There was no way he would have the blood of innocent people on his hands. That was the end game for Malacanang. The hinge factor was the good sense and patriotism of a General.

The rest was history. Will there be a repeat of this patriotic act?

F. C. Payumo was a three-term Representative of the First Districtof Bataan, and former Chairman and Administrator of SBMA. Send comments to fcpayumo@hotmail.com.

Friday, March 14, 2008

DLSZ Father and Son Scouting Assoc: "We Must Act Now"


Climate change is an urgent concern.

Global warming is taking place at an alarming rate, putting the future of mankind in grave peril. Experts predict that a temperature increase of 3 to 4 degree centigrade will cause irreversible ecological disasters that will deprive 1.8 billion people of drinking water and displace no less than 340 million more. What is clear at this point is that climate change will in inevitably affect all countries, whether rich or poor.

But climate change makes developing countries like the Philippines particularly vulnerable. In recent years, we have seen extreme weather events like typhoons, floods and landslides exact a heavy toll on lives and property, and even wipe out advances made in economic development. These ecological disaster will not only adversely affect agricultural production, destroy vital public infrastructure, and disrupt trade and commerce, they are also likely to determine our efforts to eradicate poverty in the country.

Safeguarding the future therefore calls for cooperation between the highly industrialized countries and the developing world. We have less than a decade to effectively address climate change. The rich countries with high levels of greenhouse gases emissions responsible for global warming have the moral responsibility to accelerate technology transfer and provide financing that will avert more disasters. The developing world must also do its share in mitigating the impact of ecological catastrophes that threaten their very survival.

The Philippines through the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and its allies among the civil society have committed itself to helping reduce greenhouse gas emissions to prevent disasters brought about by global warming, such as floods water shortages, and destruction of crops and marine resources.

The government has achieved much headway along this line by accelerating the shift to renewable energy sources, including biofuels. The Philippines is now one of the few countries with mandatory vehicle emission testing. It is also among the top ten countries that have the most number of clean development mechanism (CDM) projects for greenhouse gas emissions.

But government cannot do the job alone. Protecting the environment and helping arrest global warming should be the concern of everyone. Thus, government has established partnerships with various stakeholders, including local government units, the private sector and civil society groups to implement various programs and projects that will enhance environment conservation and ensure ecological balance.

Crucial in this endeavor is educating the citizenry on the urgent need to address climate change. Schools and universities are in an excellent position to inform the youth of their critical role in addressing climate change. The academic community can help government, the private sector and civil society in finding real, lasting solutions to the country’s environmental problems.

Climate change is a serious problem needing urgent action. Schools and universities properly informed about the nature and extent of global warming can come up with unique and innovative ways to respond to its adverse effects. If knowledge id power, then the academic community and the succeeding generation of young Filipinos can play a bigger role in the common effort to adequately respond to our pressing environmental problems and safeguard our own future.


Prepared by the DLSZ Father and Son
Scouting Association by
TROOP PENGUIN
30TH Father and Son Camp
Bluroze Farms
Lipa City, Batangas
February 8-10, 2008

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Former gov't officials continue their Appeal for Accountability


by Christopher M. Alcantara, DLSP Media Bureau Student Correspondent


Some 80 Former Senior Government Officials (FSGOs) convened after their appeal to President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo to reveal the real score behind the NBN-ZTE deal was ignored last 13 March at the Club Filipino in San Juan.

It may be recalled that the ex-state officials, who served under different administrations, gave Arroyo one week to address their demands ranging from Neri's unrestrained testimony before the Senate investigation to the suspension of other government officials linked to the controversial deal.

The group continued to question the integrity of the Arroyo administration and stated that the current government has been consistently associated with numerous scandals and anomalies.

Karina David, former chair of the Civil Service Commission (CSC), said that the FSGO members are questioning if President Arroyo is fit to rule the government, with anomalous transactions such as the NBN-ZTE deal allegedly being covered up by the Palace. This is highlighted by the restriction of officials from the executive department to testify before Senate investigations.

David addressed the government officials, currently working for the administration to assess if they should continue serving under Arroyo's presidency.

One of the demands of the FSGO was to prevent certain political personalities from harassing Rodolfo "Jun" Lozada Jr., star witness on the NBN-ZTE scandal, and others who were testifying in our nation's pursuit of truth.

The members of the FSGO will be joining the rally for truth and accountability in the Philippine government in Manila on Friday.

Photo by Francisco Gaurcho, DLSP Media Bureau Student Correspondent

Related articles:

1. ‘Arroyo at center of cover-up’ (Inquirer.net)

2.
Ex-Cabinet members: GMA ‘at the center’ of corruption in NBN-ZTE deal (ABS-CBN interactive)


3.
GMA at center of government anomalies’ (The Philippine Star)


Reaction to James Wolfensohn's Four-Speed World View


by Ramon R. del Rosario, Jr.
5 March 2008, Asian Institute of Management

Thank you Mr. Wolfensohn.

It is heartening to note that, three years after leaving the World Bank, Mr. Wolfensohn has not diminished in his passion for finding solutions to the problem of global poverty. I believe I am not exaggerating when I say that, for many of us here in the Philippines and in the developing world, Mr. Wolfensohn’s continues to be the face that we associate with the Bank. This is a result, not only of the length of time that he served with the Bank, but also of the clarity of vision, passion and intensity and, I might add, the charm, that he brought to the job, that helped make the World Bank a more relevant institution to many developing countries including the Philippines.

In the decade that Mr. Wolfensohn served as World Bank president, our world achieved significant progress, not only in promoting sustained growth, but more importantly, in uplifting the lives of the poor in many parts of the globe. But many have also been left behind. It has been almost a year since Mr. Wolfensohn wrote his op-ed piece about his inspired hypothesis of a “four-speed world.” and his words ring truer today as we face the challenge not only of subprime mortgage failures and the threat of global recession, but perhaps more critically for the world’s poor, the possibility of spiraling inflation in the prices of basic commodities and food, in particular. As Mr. Wolfensohn points out, the world’s economies, while becoming more interconnected, thanks to tremendous strides in telecommunications technology, are also fragmenting and growing further apart. In a worldwide economic slowdown, the laggards regrettably tend to fall further behind.

In Mr. Wolfensohn’s view, the dichotomy between the North and South divide and the East and West twain has given way to four economic groupings that move at distinct velocities. These are the Tier 1 steady-growing high-income economies, Tier 2 rapid-growing middle-income economies, Tier 3 erratic-growing emergent economies, and, lastly, the Tier 4 stagnant-growth low-income economies. In highlighting these distinctions, Mr. Wolfensohn has emphasized the interdependence among these four circles and the need for concerted action on the part of global economic leaders to uplift the conditions of the poor in Tier 3 and 4 countries.

But the assistance programs of the developed world will have very little impact if these are not complemented by genuine efforts on the part of host countries to achieve sustainable growth and development. And, speaking from the viewpoint of one who dwells in a Tier-3 volatile economy that has the patent means and resources to climb to Tier-2 status but somehow remains held back: It is not only policy that matters—governance is equally important if we are to achieve sustained development. In fact, I would say that there is really no choice but for the two to go hand in hand. Good governance places the country in a position to adopt the best economic and social policies that will promote genuine development, and poor governance ultimately leads to poor policies and poor spending choices that limit the avenues for the poor to improve themselves.

One of the functions that Mr. Wolfensohn would assign to the ASEAN economies, such as the Philippines, is to light the path by which the impoverished countries in sub-Saharan Africa can rise above their vicious cycle of economic stagnation, widespread hunger, social unrest, internecine bloody conflicts and environmental degradation. Our intended role is to offer hope by being shining examples of the success that can be achieved in terms of economic progress and social stability.

While not shrinking from this all important role, I am afraid that the Philippines at this point is not yet ready to be one of the beacons of hope for the destitute economies of the world. I fear that we would set a less than ideal example for them to follow. For unless this country comes together to finally slay the hydra of government corruption that has tormented the Philippines’ political economy for so long, then I fear that the recent economic progress that we have seen will not be sustained.

It is not merely a four-speed world. National economies, if steered improperly, can swerve off the road and into the ditch of stagnant growth. What matters just as well is who is in the driver’s seat. Corrupt government officials, because of conflicting self-interests, will take the wrong turns and select the wrong paths at the expense of the national interest. For instance, they will create state projects and programs that serve to funnel tax money into their pockets with little or no regard for these projects’ ultimate benefits to the national welfare or the reduction of poverty.

Civil society and private-sector groups, such as the Makati Business Club, have been criticized for meddling with government affairs. We businesspersons face an ethical and professional dilemma: When the economy is humming along and business prospects appear bright, do we speak out, or stay silent in the name of stability and continued “progress” when confronted with credible testimonies of widespread and outrageous corruption? But it only appears a dilemma when one looks at the situation from a short-term point of view. Over the longer run, extensive corruption will put the brakes on the economy’s development and progress. In the long run, it is a culture of integrity, truth and accountability that will serve us well. This is why, if I may use Mr. Wolfensohn’s words, we must all “give a damn!”

Corruption at the highest levels of government poses a major obstruction to the national economy’s development. Corruption tends to subvert and destroy the very institutions that would sustain economic progress. For full economic development to take place, a country must first develop the economic, social, political and legal institutions by which the government and society in general will interact and bring about this momentous change. Institution-building can take a generation or more. But what takes a generation to build, corruption can tear down very quickly. Corruption creates economic distortions and inefficiencies by undermining the government’s processes of project evaluation and approvals and diverting public investments towards high-ticket uneconomic projects with huge kickbacks, by favoring the well-connected select few, by raising the costs of doing business, and by raising the risk of broken contractual agreements.

Third-speed countries such as the Philippines can thus fall back into fourth-speed stagnation if we do not take care to cleanse our political systems of widespread corruption. In our quest to do so, civil society and the business sector cannot be rightly accused of being “backseat drivers.” Rather, we function as the car’s navigator who sits beside the driver, befitting our crucial role as determinants of the optimum route to take.

Once a country embarks on its journey towards economic development and higher-speed growth, political stability becomes a governing requisite. In order to achieve this political stability, the nation’s leaders must not only be uncorrupt but must also appear to be so for all people to see. Only by this means will national projects be successfully undertaken that are truly aimed at uplifting the poor and channeling the gains of economic progress to them. Hope for a brighter economic future for the lower rungs can only start from the top.

Monday, March 10, 2008

Lozada celebrates Mass for Truth with Lasallian Community

by Christopher M. Alcantara, De La Salle Philippines Media Bureau Student Correspondent

After visiting several schools around the metro, ZTE deal star witness Rodolfo "Jun" Lozada Jr. attended the Mass for Truth and Accountability at the Most Blessed Sacrament Chapel of De La Salle University - Manila on 9 March 2008.

Several priests, presided by Fr. Kim Lachica from the Society of Change, commenced the Eucharist, with the entire Lasallian community celebrating in our nation's pursuit of truth and accounatbility.

Br. Mike Valenzuela FSC, who delivered the homily, likened Lozada to Lazarus, a Biblical character, who had been resurrected back to life to speak the truth. "Like Jun, none of us are perfect... None of us are heroes but we all draw courage from our struggle for truth," Br. Mike said.

He furthered the People Power in 1986 was one great shining moment, regardless of the number of citizens who participated, "because if we are able to sustain self and sacrificial love for our nation, then the Filipino is worth dying for."

After the Holy Communion, Lozada was asked to lead the participants in reciting the prayer for the nation, a creed that helped him remain steadfast in his commitment to speak for the truth.

Meanwhile, Br. Bernie Oca FSC expressed his gratitude to all the individuals who contribute and support their quest for truth. He thanked the guests who attended the mass, including the 144 Sumilao farmers and the students of Adamson University who continue to express their allegiance in promoting justice and integrity in the government.

Former President Corazon Aquino shared the integral role of the religious community in National issues, quoting a speech she had delivered in 1995 about the significance of Catholic Bishop's Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) in enlightening the nation. She urged the nation to continuously pray for the religious.

When it was Lozada's turn to speak, he shared a realization about the youth. "Hindi lang pera, pati pag-asa ng bayan nananakaw ng korupsyon," he said, attributing it to the hopelessness and apathy of some adults who negatively influence their children. "Kung nakitang mali, demand accountability... We must teach our youth... give them a model of an active citizenry," he stated.

Lozada urged all those who are devoted to truth and justice to speak to those who are apathetic and those who feel hopeless. "Kwentuhan niyo po sila. Please tell them na may pag-asa pa ang Pilipinas."

The Eucharistic Celebration ended with another passionate rendition of Bayan Ko, with the Lasallian Community raising clenched fists in the air.

Students from various universities, parents, academic personnel, guests, and the religious continue to stand by Lozada's fight for truth and justice.

The next mass will be held in Miriam College, Quezon City. A prayer vigil for truth will also be held on 17 March 2008 at the Paco, Manila.


Triumphant entry. Jun Lozada Jr. and the rest of religious enter the Most Blessed Sacrament Church at De La Salle University - Manila (DLSP Media Bureau/Francis Garucho).

Smiles for Truth. Despite the political pressure, Jun Lozada still used to flash his smile to the religious who believe in him. (DLSP Media Bureau/ Francis Garucho).

Sumilao march. 144 Sumilao farmers from Bukidnon also attended the Mass for Truth . . They still appeal to claim the 144 hectare land (DLSP Media Bureau / Francis Garucho).


Sunday, March 9, 2008

Believing in the Resurrection


Mass for Truth

Most Blessed Sacrament Church
De La Salle University - Manila
March 9, 2008

Jesus said, “I am the resurrection and the life. Whoever believes in me, though he die, he shall live. Whoever lives and believes in me, will never die.”

Brothers and sisters, in today’s gospel, Jesus challenges us to believe in the resurrection. His challenge comes to us at a time when our nation faces its worst crisis since the dark days of the Marcos dictatorship. All around us we see the masks that veil the face of corruption beginning to slip, and what we see appalls us: greed at a scale that is not only unprecedented but unimaginable, the willingness of good men and women to support cover-ups and deception through outright lies or complicity in silence, the repeated desecration of the electoral process, the cynical manipulation and subversion of nearly every system of executive checks and balances, and the use of violence and coercion on the part of those in power to harass, threaten, and even destroy those who stand for truth.

Brothers and sisters, the signs of moral and spiritual death are everywhere. It is in this context that Jesus’ question takes on a special resonance: “Do you believe in the resurrection?”

Many of us say we do. But what is it we think we believe in? For if the resurrection of Jesus is merely a past event, then it has nothing to say to those of us who rage, weep, suffer, sacrifice, and struggle to see the dawn of a better day. On the other hand, if resurrection is no more than a heavenly reward, it offers little more than pious consolation to those who seek significant social change.

RESURRECTION: AN ONGOING PROCESS

But the resurrection is neither simply past nor wholly future. Rather, it is an unfolding process which begins with God raising Jesus the Crucified One to a new existence so that through his Spirit, he can become active in the lives of people like you and me, overcoming our sins and weaknesses, awakening and fortifying the innate goodness in our hearts, and filling us with quiet courage so that we can live in the light of truth.

Jun’s resurrection began months ago when alone and struggling with the decision to appear before the Senate, he decided to tell the truth. There were many reasons not to. Speaking the truth would not only end his career, it would put his life in danger and his family at risk. He would become a pariah, or worse still have to live out the rest of his days in hiding or exile. For a person such as Jun, such a prospect must have seemed like death. The alternative however was to lose his soul and this he could not do. And so it came to pass that in the solitary darkness where each man must wrestle with his God, Jun capitulated to the workings of grace, emerging like Lazarus from the tomb of his sins and fears to speak the truth to power. It is due to his courage that we are all gathered here today.

Brothers and sisters, our Risen Lord is alive in you: in your desire for truth, in your yearning for justice, in your indignation at the brazen abuse of power, in your commitment to work for meaningful and lasting change. Like Jun, none of us are perfect. Like Jun, none of us are heroes much less saints. If anything, we are recovering sinners who like St.Paul are confounded by a mysterious, unmerited love that accepts us when we feel least acceptable, a gift of strength at work in our weakness. As we look to the struggle for truth that lies ahead of us, let us draw courage from the conviction that there is a power at work here far greater than we can imagine.

Mahatma Gandhi once said, “When I despair, I remember that all through history, the way of truth and love has always won. There have been murderers and tyrants, and for a time they seem invincible. But in the end they always fall.” Truth and love. That is the power of the resurrection. That is the power of the Spirit in history. That is the power of God.

Brothers and sisters, if we are to achieve any kind of success, the driving force of our efforts must be the power of truth and love. Our aim cannot be to destroy those who oppose truth. If anything, our task is to invite them to put aside all deception, all the deeds of darkness, and to live up to the best that is in themselves. We must call them out of darkness and into the light. This stance requires us to be firm and unrelenting in our pursuit of truth and accountability, demanding that the guilty face the consequences of their wrongdoings, but it also calls us to be compassionate with those who seek to redeem their souls.


PEOPLE POWER: RESURRECTION IN PRACTICE

This is what distinguishes People Power from the rule of the mob. Let me be clear that to my mind, People Power is the only effective means we have at present of insuring that truth emerges and that the guilty be accountable for their crimes. It is the one thing this administration fears because it knows a government’s power ultimately derives from the support of the people. As a son and veteran of the EDSA Revolution, let me share with you one experience that struck me during those tense but glorious days.

It was late one evening and thousands were milling in the streets. Coming in with a busload of teachers from Lipa, Batangas, that morning, I had seen the crowds and knew they stretched all the way from Buendia to Farmer’s Market in Cubao. The atmosphere was festive. As I walked the streets, I saw the rich distributing food to the poor, the houses of the wealthy opening their doors to tired and ragged passers-by, matrons offering cups of water to militant laborers, battle-clad soldiers embracing the nuns they had once faced down in rallies, and friendly smiles on nearly every face. It was as if all class barriers had dissolved overnight and we were for once what we aspired to be—united as Filipinos.

When the unconfirmed news came that there were cannons pointed at us from the University of Life (now Ultra), a palpable tension through the crowd. When helicopters swept low overhead , people ducked and looked up anxiously—searching for the LABAN sign that would mark them as defectors to the people’s cause. It suddenly occurred to me standing there, one with the huge crowd, that I could die at any moment—but that it didn’t seem to matter. This is where I wanted to be. This is where I needed to be. If I were to die, I could not have chosen a better time and place. In that moment, I truly felt what Ninoy must have meant when he said, THE FILIPINO IS WORTH DYING FOR.

Some time later, one of my aunts who had been in the States during the event told me this story. She had been doing groceries at a supermarket when she noticed that people were milling around the display TVs, all eyes glued to the events unfolding at EDSA. As she paid for her groceries, the lady at the cash register leaned over and asked her, “Excuse me Ma’am, but are you a Filipino?” When she answered yes, the lady turned around and yelled excitedly, “Hey everyone! Look! There’s a Filipino here!” and right then and there everyone in the supermarket burst into a standing ovation. It must have been the proudest moment of her life. It was our one great shining moment as Filipinos.

This is why I am dismayed at the attempts to demonize People Power. To dismiss it as mob rule is to spit on the graves of those who gave their lives to make it happen—the Ninoy Aquinos, the Evelio Javiers, the Ed Jopsons, and all those unknown, unnamed martyrs who fell in the long dark night of tyranny without ever seeing the dawn.

Brothers and sisters, if we are to sustain People Power, it must be fueled by more than indignation. If we are to sustain People Power, we must understand that real People Power is rooted in the selfless, sacrificial love that says, THE FILIPINO IS WORTH DYING FOR.
Listen again to those words and you will hear in them the voice of another who offered his body to be broken and poured out his blood for our salvation. This sacrificial love, this cruciform love which comes to us even now in the eucharist is what makes authentic People Power more than just a numbers game. Inspired by truth and love, People Power becomes nothing less than the RESURRECTION IN PRACTICE, our participation in God’s reaching into the places of sin and death to bring forth new life.

THE BEATITUDES AS STEPS TO RESURRECTION

The question is, how can we enter into this spirit? How can we transform People Power into a constructive force for truth, justice and peace?

I believe that the path to resurrection entails walking the path of the Beatitudes, and if that sounds obscure or difficult, let me say that I believe that this is the path Jun himself is learning to walk. Jun’s journey to the light is also ours.

The path of the Beatitudes entails three stages: CONVERSION, REPARATION and CONSECRATION.

The stage of CONVERSION comes when, faced with the enormity of evil, we recognize our powerlessness, our inability to change things on our own. We are a people damaged by sin-- not saints or heroes but prodigal sons and daughters. Like the publican in the parable, we must recognize the truth of our condition, and with POVERTY OF SPIRIT cry out to God, “Lord, have mercy on me a sinner.” Only the recognition of our essential poverty opens us up to the saving power of God.

Let us also bear in mind that the culture of corruption is not the product of a few malicious individuals, but the flowering of seeds we ourselves have planted. Let us not lay the death of journalists, activists, labor organizers and victims of poverty and despair solely at the doorstep of politicians, the police, or the military. Let us not say that corruption is just their fault. We too are complicit by our moral compromises, by our willingness to keep silent rather than hold the guilty accountable, by our readiness to look the other way because our interests favor the maintenance of the status quo. Thus, we all need to MOURN, to cry “Mea culpa!” as Jun has done, for the ways in which we have allowed, excused and contributed to the culture of corruption. Only by sincerely mourning the dismal way of things can we be poised to change them.

The stage of conversion finally brings us to the point of surrender to God. That is what happened to Jun when, on the evening of February 6, in the company of Bishop Pabillo and a motley crew of religious, Jun committed himself to the truth. MEEKNESS is abandonment to the will of God. It is the spirit of Jesus at Gethsemane praying, “Father, if it be your will, let this cup pass from me. But let your will, not mine, be done.” This submission paradoxically brings with it an inner freedom and peace, a profound confidence in the power of truth and love to triumph over deception and violence. Perhaps that is why Jun keeps saying, “I thought I was defending the truth, instead it is the truth that is defending me.”

The second stage on the journey to resurrection is REPARATION. How do we repair the damage done to our souls and the soul of our nation? The answer of Jesus in the Beatitudes is twofold: RIGHTEOUSNESS and MERCY. Righteousness involves the desire to live a life pleasing to God, a life of integrity and justice. The truly righteous however are not arrogant; they understand human fragility and know that their righteousness rests not on any human perfection but on the mercy and fidelity of God who continually offers us salvation inspite of ourselves. The righteous are not sinless; rather, they are the ones who readily admit their sins repent of them, and seek to put things right.

MERCY, which flows from our identification with those who suffer, involves entering into the places of pain and extending to others the mercy we have received from God. Mercy is solicitude for the victims of injustice, but it is also solicitude for the perpetrators whose sins eat away at their souls. It strikes me that while Jun has every reason to condemn those who have used, betrayed and threatened him, he has repeatedly emphasized that goodness and compassion, not anger and indignation are the foundations on which a just and honorable society must be built. It strikes me that his predominant stance has been compassion for the people who are forced to lie in order to protect themselves or their masters, perhaps because he too has been the object of God’s compassion.

The final stage in the resurrection journey is CONSECRATION and by this I mean the free offering of ourselves to God to be used by him to accomplish his purposes and plans. Such an undertaking however involves purging ourselves of pride, hatred, and self-interest. Thus, we are summoned to become PURE IN HEART in order that God may use us to call sinners to his peace.

Now there is a cowardly peace borne of fear that avoids confrontation and conflict, one that uses concession and moral compromise to maintain the status quo. This is a fake peace, a peace without moral cost. True peace, God’s peace comes about through fidelity to the way of truth and love in the face of opposition. It comes through the willingness to confront, absorb and forgive the violence done to us, refusing to repay evil for evil, returning instead love for pain. In this way PEACEMAKERS hope to awaken the innate goodness in people and summon them to live up to the best that is in themselves. This is what it means to love our enemies—to help them repent and save their souls.

Enemy-love is the most Godlike of loves because it approximates God’s love for us. From the divine perspective, we are all at various stages of active rebellion against God. We are the enemy. But, the Father’s response to our rejection of him is to send us his Son to reveal the depths of the Father’s love to the point of dying on the cross. On the cross, humanity’s rejection of God is disarmed by God’s divine embrace. In like manner, the peacemakers are those who care enough to return love for pain. In doing this they become truly God’s sons and daughters, committed to carrying out his reconciling purposes in the world.

Finally, consecration involves the willingness to be vilified and suffer for the truth. Thus the final beatitude addressed to those PERSECUTED FOR RIGHTEOUSNESS’ SAKE summons us to patience and persistence in resisting evil without violence at the cost of our reputations and even our lives. Such a sacrifice, modeled on that of Jesus, blossoms into eternal life.

Thus we see that the beatitudes by inviting us to move from conversion, to reparation and consecration enable us to become not just recipients but participants in the mystery of the resurrection. This is the Christian challenge of People Power.

Brothers and sisters, I am sure there are many people who still ask you “Why keep up these protests? Why make noise and take to the streets? The time for People Power has passed. You are just ruining the economy. Nothing will change anyway. Is this all worth it?” To them I offer these words from the late Senator Jose Diokno, that great champion of human rights, who wrote them to his son during the dark days of the dictatorship:

Why be honest when it pays to be dishonest? Why be fair to others when they are unfair to you? Why fight for others when they won’t fight for you?—or even for themselves? Why think for yourself when it is easier to let others think for you? Why lead when it is less troublesome to obey? Why have principles when others don't- and they often get away with it?. . .The answer I think lies in what life means to you. If life means having a good time, money, fame, power, security—then you don’t need principles; all you need are techniques. In fact, it's better not to have principles; they would just get in your way. On the other hand, if happiness means more than a good time, respect more than fame, right more than power, and peace of soul more than security; if death doesn’t end life but transforms it, then you must be true to yourself and to God, and to love the truth, justice and freedom that are God’s other names...

In this eucharist, let us pray that the Risen Lord grant us the grace to be above all things, true to ourselves, to our people, and to our God. May we walk the path of the beatitudes and so share in Christ’s resurrection.

In the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Catholic schools in Taft Ave. stage noise barrage anew


Christopher M. Alcantara
De La Salle Philippines Media Bureau Student Correspondent

Another Busina para sa Katotohanan was staged at around 615 PM on 5 March 2008. This noise barrage, staged as an appeal to the government and the rest of the nation to uphold truth and justice, involved students, administrators and personnel from De La Salle University – Manila (DLSU-M), De La Salle – College of Saint Benilde (DLS-CSB) and St. Scholastica’s College – Manila (SSC).

Upon hearing of the news that Romulo Neri was slated to attend the NBN-ZTE deal Senate inquiry on 7 March 2008, the Lasallian community wanted to intensify its efforts in promoting a culture of truth and integrity in the Philippine government.

At 530 PM, students from DLSU-Manila convened at the Amphitheater for the continuous prayer vigil co-sponsored by the Center for Social Concern and Action (COSCA) and the Lasallian Pastoral Office (LSPO).

Lining up both sides of Taft Avenue, the concerned and vigilant individuals from the academic community encouraged motorists to honk their horns, a sign of support in the nation’s quest for truth. Armed with whistles and placards calling for transparency and accountability, volunteers from the Committee on National Issues and Concerns (CNIC), COSCA, LSPO and the Political Science Society (POLISCY) of DLSU-Manila spearheaded the noise barrage as more students from the three campuses joined the cause.

Flags of the three schools were also displayed as some students and administrators continued to express their concerns on recent political issues, hoping that their appeal for truth will be heard.

Meanwhile, the two political parties in DLSU-Manila, Alyansang Tapat sa Lasalista and Partido Santugon sa Tawag ng Panahon, who were currently campaigning for the University General Elections, joined the rest of the community in raising awareness and involvement.

The noise barrage was punctuated by a candle-lighting and a brief prayer service facilitated by the Lasallian Pastoral Office.

SC, tagumpay sa GEN-ID


Faye Bernadine Cabio, Justin David Pineda at Janice Rodriguez, Mga Kasapi ng Ang Pahayagang Plaridel


Matapos ang paglunsad ng Generosity ID (GEN-ID) ng office of the President (OPRES) upang suportahan ang One La Salle Scholarship Fund noong University Week ng Pamantasang De La Salle-Maynila (DLSU-M), nakalikom ito ng Php 57,6503.50 mula sa mga estudyante sa iba’t ibang mga antas. Nakilahok din ang mga pakultad at administrasyon ng Pamantasan sa Gen-ID. Ang batch ID# 107 ang nakapag bigay ng pinakamalaking donasyon sa halagang Php 20, 302.50.

Ayon sa talaan ng OPRES, umabot sa 744 ang lumahok na mga estudyante, pakultad at myembro ng administrasyon. Php10,860 ang naibigay ng ID# 106, Php 11,507 naman sa ID#105, Php10,564.00 sa ID#104 pababa at Php 4,820 ang galing sa mga pakultad at myembro ng administrasyon. Sa panayam ng Ang Pahayagang Plaridel (APP) kay Noey Arcinue, Pangulo ng Student Council (SC), sinabi niyang isang Lasalyano sa ilalim ng OPRES ang nakaisip na magkaroon ng isang fund-raising activity na lalahukan ng mga Lasalyano para sa One La Salle Scholarship Fund. Kadalasan umanong mga alumni lamang ang sumusuporta at nakikilahok sa mga aktibidad ngunit wala masayadong kooperasyon ang mga estudyante.

Istratehiya ni Arcinue para sa Gen-ID na malaman at makilahok lahat ng 10,000 Lasalyano rito at hindi lang basta makalikom ng pera. “Hindi lang yung kunwari itong mga tao lang sa SPS (Student Personnel Services) mag-dodonate ng let’s say [Php]500. significant amount nga pero konti lang yung makakaalam atmakakpagbigay,” paliwanag ni Arcinue. Sa isang hiwalay na panayam naman nga APP kay Kirk Amante, Finance Head ng OPRES at Project Head ng Gen-ID, sinabi niyang naisip ng mga tauhan ng OPRES na mas maganda kung magiging paligsahan ng pinakamaraming donasyon ang makakalap mula sa iba’t ibang mga ID number’s upang magkaroon ng pagkakapantay-pantay kaysa bawat kolehiyo ang paligsahan dahil may mga kolehiyong may maliit na populasyon.

Para kay Amante, naging matagumpay ang naging proyekto kahit na hindi umabot sa Php1 Milyon ang nalikom mula sa pamayanang Lasalyano, nasaksihan naman ang pagbibigay ng pera galing sa kanilang mga puso. “Nakakataba ng puso na makita ang mga taong lumalapit sa aming mga booth upang magbigay ng donasyon na alam nilang wala silang makukuhang anumang kapalit kung hindi ang mga salitang “thank you”. Dito naipakita ang pagiging matulungin ng mga Lasalyano,” paliwanag niya. Ipinaliwanag niya. Ipinaliwanag naman ni Arcinue ang dahilan kung bakit Php 1 Milyon ang target nilang makuhaang donasyon. “The 1 M target is for, kami ng organizers was to set kahit papaano, objective or parang visual goal. Yung hindi lang yung “guys, donate, guys, donate” tapos hindi maramdaman yung goal, yung target. So, sabi naming, ano ba ang feasible sa atin na yung we stretch our limits also.” Nilinaw ni Arcinue na kung mayroong 10,000 mga estudyante, lohikal na makapagbibigay ng Php100 isa sa isang lingo. Para naman hindi maging mabigat sa bulsa ng bawat estudyante, hinati na lang sa Php 20 bawat araw.

Na-anunsyo naman ng husto ang Gen ID ayon kina Amante at Arcinue. Nagkaroon ng email blasts, text brigade at room-to-room announcements. Nakatulong din ang Information Technology Center (ITC) na mai-anunsyo ang Gen ID sa website ng DLSU-M pati na sa My.Lasalle email at ang The Lasallian (TLS) upang maisapubliko ang proyekto. Pero ayon kay Amante, naging pinakaepektibo pa rin ang “word of mouth” at pagpapakita sa kapwa estudyante na nagbibigay ang bawat isa.


Positibo ang tingin nina Amante at Arcinue na posibleng makamit ang Php 1 Milyon bilang suporta sa One La Salle Scholarship Fund. Para kay Amante, kung mas mahaba ang panahon na inilaan para sa GenID, mas marami pang pera ang makukuha. Dagdag pa niya, kung itutuloy sa isang termino ang GenID, maabot ang Php 1 Milyon. Ngunit, paglilinaw niya, kung maabot na ang Php 1 Milyon, hindi titigil ang SC at ipagpatuloy ang paghanap ng paraan upang makalikom pa ng pera para sa One La Salle Scholarship Fund.

Nagpapasalamat si Amante sa lahat ng mga estudyanteng sumuporta sa GenID. Aniya, “Tunay ngang naipakita ang pagiging mapagbigay at pagiging matulungin ng mga Lsalyano. Sa bawat donasyon na aming natanggap ay nakakataba ng puso at napakalaking tulong sa pagpapaaral sa mga iskolar na estudyante sa hinaharap. Sinisigurado naming na ang inyong mga donasyon ay malayo ang mararating.”

Mga Lasalyano, aktibo sa kilos protesta

Ian Zander Basconcillo at Krist Trizha Mendoza, Mga Kasapi ng Ang Pahayagang Plaridel
Tomo. XXIII BLG. 9


AKTIBONG nakikibahagi ang Pamantasang De La Salle-Maynila (DLSU-M), sa pangunguna ng Committee on National Issues and Concerns (CNIC), sa mga isyung pulitikal na kasalukuyang nagaganap sa Pilipinas partikular na ang kontrobersya sa Zhong Xing Telecommunication Equipment Company Limited (ZTE)- National Broadband Network (NBN) Deal. Simula nang muling nabuhay ang usaping ito, naglunsad ang CNIC ng serye ng mga aktibidad bilang pagsuporta sa hakbangin ni Rodolfo “Jun” Lozada na isiwalat ang kanyang nalalaman ukol sa isyu ng katiwalian sa gobyerno.


Sa pagtutulungan ng iba’t ibang sektor ng Pamantasan tulad ng Center for Social Concerns and Actions (COSCA), Student Council (SC), Student Publication Office (SPO), mga partidong pulitikal at ilang mga organisasyon gaya ng Political Science Society (POLISCY) at Debate Society (DebSoc), maraming aktibidad na ang naisagawa at marami pa rin ang patuloy na isinasagawa sa layuning makamtan ang katotohanan sa likod ng ZTE-NBN Deal. Kabilang dito ang pamamahagi ng mga flyer na naglalaman ng buod ng kontrobersya kasama na ang paglabas ng mga testigo partikular na si Lozada. Bukod dito, mayroong mga signature campaign na isinagawa sa bawat kolehiyo ng Pamantasan at upang makakalap naman ng pondo para sa Sanctuary Truth Fund, nagbebenta ng mga statement shirt ang College of Liberal Arts (CLA) at COSCA sa halagang Php 130 bawat isa.

Nagkaroon ng porum noong ika-13 ng Pebrero sa pangunguna ni Br. Pesident Armin Luistro FSC kasama ang iba’t ibang myembro ng Pamayanang Lasalyano upang patuloy na bantayan ang mga kasalukuyang kaganapan sa kontrobersya. Sa nasabing porum, ipinalabas ng SC ang isang maikling video na tumutuligsa sa katiwalian sa gobyerno at humihingi naman ng suporta mula sa mga mamamayan na makibahagi sa pagtuklas ng katotohanan sa likod ng mag katiwalian ng gobyerno at makiisa sa pagtamo ng hustisya. Tumuloy ang mga dumalo sa Taft Avenue para sa isang candle lighting ceremony na nagtapos sa pagpapamalas ng suporta kay Lozada.

Simula naman noong ika-18 ng Pebrero, buong linggong ginanap ang isang prayer vigil sa Amphitheater ng Pamantasan upang mabigyan ng pagkakataon ang mga estudyante na makibahagi sa panawagan para sa katotohanan ukol sa mga katiwalian at reporma sa gobyerno. Nagsilbi rin itong pagkakataon upang mabigyan ng sapat na impormasyon ang mga dumalo tungkol sa pinakahuling pangyayari sa isyung ito. Bukod pa rito, dalawang beses na tumungo sa Senado ang CNIC upang saksihan ang pagdinig sa mga isinagawang pagtestigo ni Lozada at ng iba pang sangkot dito. Kasabay nito, isang live feed ang ipinalabas sa Central Plaza.

Sa layuning mas mapaigting ang pagpapahayag ng hinaing sa mga kontrobersya at iwaksi ang pagtapak sa karapatan ng bawat mamamayan sa katotohan, nagkaroon ng busina para sa katotohanan noong ika-22 ng Pebrero sa ganap na alas-6 ng gabi. Isa itong aktibidad sa pakikipagtulungan ng DLSU-M, De La Salle College of St. Benilde (DLS-CSB) at St. Scholastica’s College-Manila(SSC). Nagtipon tipon ang mga nagsipagdalo sa Taft Avenue, Maynila dala ang mga streamer at iba pang pampaingay upang hikayatin ang mga motorista na bumusina at maglikha ng ingay kung naniniwala man sila sa katotohanan alinsunod sa mga pahayag ni Lozada laban sa pamahalaan. Dinaluhan din ng ilang estudyante ang isang youth concert sa Katipunan, Quezon City na pinangasiwaan naman ng Ateneo De Manila University (ADMU).

Nakibahagi naman sa darating na ika-29 ng Pebrero ang ilang kasapi ng pamayanang Lasalyano kasama ang Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP), mga myembro ng pribadong grupo, kinatawan ng isang interfaith gathering. Magaganap ang nasabing pagtitipon sa Luneta, Maynila.

Ayong kay Noey Arcinue, pangulo ng SC, magkakaroon din ng mga maliliit na aktibidad ang bawat kolehiyo ng Pamantasan tulad na lamang ng freedom wall. Dito maaring magsulat ang mga nagnanais magpahayag ng kanilang mga sentimento ukol sa kasalukuyang mga pangyayari sa ating bansa partikular na ang sa ZTE-NBN Deal. Sa pakikipagpulong naman nila sa SPO at De La Salle Philippines (DLSP), binabalak na magkaroon ng online hub upang mas madaling maipamahagi ang mga paninindigan, manifesto, video streamers at iba pa sa mga myembero sa pamayanang Lasalyano. Magiging tagapamagitan din ito ng pagsasagawa ng online forums at paglalahad ng mga bagong pangyayari ukol isyu.

Binanggit din ni Arcinue na magsusulat sila ng liham sa mga pakultad ukol sa hiling ng mga estudyante na gawing bahagi ng diskusyon sa loob ng silid-aralan ang mga napapanahong isyu sa bansa tulad ng ZTE-NBN Deal. Kaugnay nito, sinabi ni Dr. Emmanuel Garci, pinuno ng CNIC, na nakipag-usap na sila sa Theology and Religious Department (TRED) at Political Science Department upang mag-organsa ng mga porum ukol sa kanilang sinusoportahan kung hindi ang marami pang taong tulad niya na tumestigo upang isiwalat ang katotohanan at ipabatid ang samu’t saring katiwalian sa gobyerno. Ani Arcinue, “We support his [Lozada] act of bravery, his courage to reveal the truth amidst the risk on his safety and his family’s safety.” Malapit si Lozada sa pamayanang Lasalyano hindi lamang sa kadahinalang sa La Salle Greenhills(LSGH) kasalukuyang nag aaral ang ilan sa mga anal nito kung hindi dahil nakuha niya ang suporta ng mga Lasallian Brothers nang malaman ang paglabag sa kanyang karapatang pantao.


Kumpara sa mga nakalipas na taon, aktibong naglalabas sa kasalukuyan ng kongkretong pagtugon ang ilang sektor ng Pamantasan hinggil sa mga kontrobersyang nakakaapekto sa mga mamamayan. “Kung nagiging consistent lang tayo with our standings sa call for truth, accountability, and change in our government, it’s not new,” paliwanag naman ni Arcinue. Ayon pa sa kanya, hindi umano bago ang paglalabas ng simpleng deklarasyon ukol sa isang isyung pampulitika. Ayon naman kay Garcia, part eng prinsipyo ng Pamantasan na “Achiever for God and Country” ang mga aktibidad na kanilang isinagawa.

Natuwa si Garcia sa pagtaas ng partisipasyon ng pamayanang Lasalyano, partikular na ang mga estudyante, sa mga aktibidad na kanilang inilunsad. Nais niyang imbitahan ang lahat nga sektor ng pamayanang Lasalyano na makibahagi sa mga aktibidad na inoorganisa ng komite at higit sa lahat, makialam sa mga isyung nagaganap sa ating bansa. Aniya maaring magkaroon ng aktibong pakikilahok hindi lamang sa pamamagitan ng pagsama sa mga aktibidad kung hindi rin sa pamamagitan ng pagbibigay ng mga komento ukol sa aktibidad na isinagawa ng CNAC. Ayon kay Garcia, bukas ang kanilang komite para sa kahit anong komentong ukol dito.

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

Lasallian parents convene for first consultation meeting


by Christopher Alcantara, DLSP Media Bureau Student Correspondent

Parents of students from the different La Salle schools all over the Philippines attended the First National Consultation Meeting of Lasallian Parents, co-sponsored by De La Salle Philippines (DLSP) and the De La Salle University – Parents of University Students Organization (DLSU-PUSO) on 3 to 4 March held at the DLSP Board Room at 20th floor of Andrew Gonzalez FSC Hall.

The two-day gathering focused on recent developments from the various Parents Organizations, as well as plans for the National Federation of Lasallian Parents (NFLP) and the One La Salle Scholarship Fund.

The parents participated in a brief icebreaker of games to encourage interaction among the representatives.

Divided into two groups, the parents discussed reports on key developments with regard to the involvement of parents organizations within La Salle schools. The discussion also included the on-going activities of their respective organizations, as well as additional needs and concerns of parents for their school.

On day two, Br. Armin Luistro FSC, Brother President of De La Salle Philippines, spoke to the parents regarding the new structure of DLSP and the One La Salle Campaign Fund.

Through the fortified network of the 18 La Salle schools, the participation of parents in the various projects of DLSP (especially its scholarship campaign) is highly encouraged. Br. Armin also presented plans for the Lasallian Centennial Celebration on 2011.

Meanwhile, Yolanda A. Yao, President of DLSU-PUSO, presented a proposal for a NFLP. If formally established, parents from all 18 La Salle schools will be able to effectively coordinate with each other regarding the enduring programs of DLSP. It will also allow each parents organization to promote their projects and activities to the entire Lasallian Family.



DLSU-M org refurbishes 30 computers for LSU students

La Salle Computer Society (LSCS), a professional student organization in De La Salle University – Manila, ran a project to give old computers to students of La Salle University (LSU) in Ozamiz City.

According to Joseph Valencia, LSCS Vice President for Socio Civic, the LSCS volunteers collected and refurbished 30 old computer monitors.


Last 1 March, the students checked parts of the computers at De La Salle Philippines (DLSP) office in Br. Andrew Gonzalez FSC Hall. The computers will be shipped to Ozamiz this week.

Volunteers from LSCS target to refurbish 100 computer monitors at the end of the term. Valencia hopes that the LSU students will be able to use the computers for enriching activities and academic matters.

Br. Bong Servando FSC, LSU administrator, met the LSCS members at DLSP last 3 March to thank them for the project.


Volunteers.
Members of La Salle Computer Society and DLSP employees had a photo up with Br. Bong Servando FSC of LSU (Photo courtesy of LSCS).





Sunday, March 2, 2008

The Roots of Our Eyes Are in the Heart (UST Mass for Jun Lozada)


Rolando V. De la Rosa, OP

University of Santo Tomas


“If you look at something for the 100th time, you are in danger of seeing it for the first time.” G.K. Chesterton wrote this enigmatic line to remind us that familiar things become strange when we look at these intently. The most ordinary things can reveal an extraordinary significance that we can grasp only when we focus on it with attention. Perhaps this is the reason why we say: “Pay attention.” Why not give, or share, or spare our attention? We say “pay attention” because attention is the price we pay in order to capture, even only in part, the superabundant meaning of reality.

Paying attention entails, not only the use of our eyes. Something monopolizes our attention when it captures our heart. That is why lovers say: “I only have eyes for you.” In a very real sense, we only see, and our way of seeing is determined, not so much by the clarity of our eyesight, but by the disposition of our heart. The way we see things reveal, not the way things are, but the way we are. A person with a clean heart will see beauty and peace around him. A person whose heart is clouded by suspicion and mistrust will see nothing but betrayal and deception. The roots of our eyes are in the heart.

In the first reading, God warned the prophet Samuel who was examining the candidates for the Kingship of Israel: “Do not judge by his looks or by his stature. Yahweh does not judge as men judge. For human beings see with their eyes; Yahweh sees with the heart.”

Despite the fact that David was barely a teenager, inexperienced and lacking in worldly wisdom, God chose him to rule over Israel. He saw something in David that made him fit to be a king. And even when he committed abominable sins that cried to heaven for justice, David remained “close to God’s heart.” What did God see in David? It must be David’s humility. In moments of triumph, he would glorify God in songs and uninhibited dancing. In moments of defeat and utter failure, he would cry to God for mercy and pardon. Even when David was deserted by his army, cursed by his friends, and abandoned by his children, David had the humility to seek refuge in God. David had taught us this lesson: It is only in utter humility that we realize God is all we need because, after all, God is all we have.

The blind man in the Gospel who was healed by Jesus had the same human quality that David had. He was humble. St. Thomas Aquinas wrote that “humility is truth”. Humility comes from the word “humus”, which means solid or ground. A humble person has his feet set firmly on the ground of his being. A humble person accepts the truth about himself; he does not pretend to be somebody else. He does not wear a mask, unlike the Pharisees whom Jesus called “hypocrites” and “whitened sepulchers”.

After he was healed, the blind man declared without equivocation: “I am the one”. Take me for who I am: “This is me.” When he was brought to the Pharisees, and was asked to testify about his healing, he simply stated the truth, without adornment or exaggeration. He said: “He put paste on my eyes, and I washed, and now I see.” And when the Pharisees, the experts in the law subjected him to cross-examination, asking him: “What do you think of this man who opened your eyes?” His answer was straightforward: “He is a prophet.”

It was his humility that made the truth of his statement unassailable. His humility also allowed him to see Jesus no longer as a man, or a healer, but as God. He exclaimed before the very human Jesus: “Lord, I believe.” Not only did Jesus heal his blindness; he also led him to faith and conversion. From that moment on, he learned to see, no longer with his eyes, but with his heart. Like King David, the blind man had taught us a lesson: God choose people to witness the truth, not because they are blameless but because something has happened to them.

We can see the truth only if we first have it in our hearts. Let us offer this mass for ourselves: to make us humble, truthful, honest, like David and the blind man whose sight was restored. If there is one word that can contain these three qualities, the word would be INTEGRITY. The word comes from integer which means “whole”. A person with integrity has a sense of wholeness or consistency within him. His thought is consistent with his words, which in turn are consistent with his actions. Truth must be true in all its part. A half-truth is a whole lie. We cannot be warriors of truth if we are not men and women of integrity.

It would be simplistic and hypocritical to say the problem of our country is the President and the men and women who are behind her. This is a dangerous misunderstanding of the crisis we are facing today. The integrity crisis involves not just the President and the men and women behind her. The integrity crisis involves us all. In the body of Christ, we belong to one another, we affect one another, and we cannot escape one another. St. Paul wrote: “If one member of the body suffers, all the members suffer with it; if one member is honored, all the members rejoice with it.” Whether we like it or not, for better or for worse, we are all connected. Sin, even the most private, eventually destroys society.

The crisis of integrity involves us all. Who of us have a corner on virtue that we can say we have never lied to other people? Or worse, lied to ourselves? Jesus said: Do not judge. His command is not against making a true and righteous judgment. It asks us to beware, lest in our haste to judge others, we might be like the hypocrites: judging others as absolutely corrupt simply because we are blinded by our exaggerated piety and moral smugness.

It is easy to tell the truth; but the next easiest is to believe our own lie. Self-deception is easy especially for people who know that the discovery of their bad deeds can be devastating to their self-image and sense of well-being. Self-deception is the most abominable species of lying. Why? Because a person can become so submerged in the intricate details and implications of the lie, that the continuation of the lie becomes second nature.

If we want to restore truth and integrity in society, government, and the churches, we must stop looking for scapegoats to ease our burden of guilt and failure. We seem to have a penchant for putting the blame on just one person or a group of persons in order to take the heat off ourselves. We tend to shift attention away from our inability to govern ourselves to our self-appointed role as a social critic and reformer.

Let’s face it. We delude ourselves if we think that by driving Gloria Arroyo away from Malacanang, as we did with Marcos and Erap, integrity and honesty will be restored. The two previous People Power events have not produced this desired result.

It is true, we can now boast of our democratic institutions. Last Thursday, a successful Chinese businessman told me how fortunate we Filipinos are. “People in China are progressing by leaps and bounds” he said, “but they do not enjoy the freedom that Filipinos have.” Ah, freedom. I muttered to myself: “We are so free, that’s why we are so lost.”

Democracy exists where reciprocal bonds, governed by truth and justice, link people to one another. Democracy exhibits the belief that human beings are capable of making correct judgments and responsible human decisions. But take a look at our elections. This process is supposed to be our most palpable way of manifesting to the world that we are indeed a democracy. But Gore Vidal’s criticism of the American election also applies to ours: “Our system of electing politicians to office is rotten and corrupted to its core, because organized money has long since replaced organized and enlightened public opinion. And most of it comes from rich people and corporations, who now own our political process –lock, stock and pork barrel.”

Many present-day elected officials are mere surrogates of hidden power-brokers who, after election, take back what they had invested in. This deeply entrenched system of patronage easily lures honest officials into the despicable practice of graft and corruption.

If we want to restore integrity and honesty in the government, the best way is not through a rigodon of leaders who are forcibly removed through People power, but through an enlightened, educated and conscientious electoral process. WE HAVE 26 MONTHS BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION. We have enough time TO PREPARE OURSELVES SO WE CAN VOTE WISELY. Let us use People Power during election time, not only before or after. It has happened in the past, in Pampanga, in Isabela, and in other less known places in our country. We can make it happen again.

As early as now, schools, colleges, and universities, and conscientious government officials as well as churches, NGO’s, and the rest of civil society can adopt this as their advocacy going into 2010.

You may object: The present government leadership will not allow us to do that. Well, this happens only because our brand of democracy is obsessed with leadership. We idolize our government leaders and place our destinies in their hands. In truth, democracy will not work without conscientious constituents. We have to discard that model of democracy which portrays government leaders as the active molders, and we their constituents as the passive clay. Our task as voters is not only to elect our officials but to keep them in their proper place, which is to be our SERVANTS, not our lords and masters. We have to make them aware that they are accountable to us.

What our country needs at this crucial stage of our history are voters with an enlightened will, voters who will not elect officials who will treat them like doormats, citizens who will not exchange their conscience for convenience, nor their principles for monetary gain.

Bertrand Russell once wrote that democracy, the leader cannot be more stupid than his constituents. For, the more stupid he is, the more stupid still are his constituents for electing him.

People may again raise this objection: “The next election is still too far ahead. We have to settle this corruption mess immediately. We have to bring to the light those who are guilty right now.” Indeed, we have to do that. But it seems that People power appears to be our way of saying: We want it bad and we want it now, not sooner or later, but NOW. We are obsessed with speed. We want everything quickly and instantaneously. Even our prayers are done in a fast forward mode to save time. We become impatient when we don’t get what we want. Don’t you notice? We are always in a hurry but always late. Life is not a matter of speed but depth. The faster we go through life, the shallower our understanding of it becomes. Quick successes usually are a fluke. Real and lasting victories take time.

Finally, why do we march for truth? What motivates us? Is it love for truth or are we simply furious at the people whom we want to punish? We must remember that prolonged and habitual anger can be very exhausting. Anger can turn even the most reasonable man into a fanatic. Fanatics are hopelessly one-sided. They are filled with an almost infallible certainty of their rectitude, and an equally infallible certainty of their rectitude, and an equally infallible certainty of the iniquity of those whom they think are evil.

Unrequited anger festers into hatred. This is even more destructive because hatred makes it almost impossible for us to forgive. Contrary to what we think, forgiveness is not the prerogative of all. Not everyone can forgive. A cockroach cannot pardon a horse for trampling it to death. The power to forgive is correlative with the capacity to punish. We exercise our ability to forgive when, even if we have the right and the power to inflict punishment, we show the strength of will to control our desire to destroy and humiliate our opponent.

Gandhi once asked: “What is victory if it is measured by the gauge of destruction?” Victory does not consist in conquering the enemy, but in conquering ourselves. As he beautifully puts it: “Strength does not come from physical power, but from an indomitable will to control our desire to retaliate.”

As we continue with this Eucharistic celebration, it is good to remember the beautiful lines of Maya Angelou:

History, despite its wrenching pain cannot be unlived.

And if we faced with courage, need not be lived again…

Here on the pulse of this new day, you may have the grace to

Look up and out;

And into your sister’s eyes, into your brother’s face, your country

And say simply, very simply with hope:

Good Morning.

Good morning. It means a good beginning. In humility, honesty, and integrity, let us ask God to make this beginning happen to us and in our country, through his unending grace. Amen.